The Division of Labour refers to the specialization of work where different tasks are assigned to different individuals or groups to improve efficiency and productivity. It has been a crucial topic in sociology, economics, and industrial studies, influencing how societies organize work and social relationships. While many thinkers have studied the division of labour, Émile Durkheim provided the first comprehensive sociological explanation by linking it with social solidarity and the transformation of society.
Division of Labour: Views of Major Thinkers
Before Durkheim, several scholars explained the concept from different angles:
1️⃣ Adam Smith (Economics Perspective)
Adam Smith, in his famous work The Wealth of Nations (1776), stated that division of labour increases efficiency, productivity, and economic prosperity. He illustrated this through the example of a pin-making factory, showing how specialization speeds up production.
2️⃣ Karl Marx (Conflict Perspective)
Marx viewed the division of labour negatively. According to him, capitalism divides work into small repetitive tasks, which causes:
- Alienation of workers from their labour
- Loss of creativity and identity
- Class exploitation by the bourgeoisie
Thus, Marx saw division of labour as a major source of class conflict.
3️⃣ Herbert Spencer (Evolutionary Perspective)
Spencer compared societies with biological organisms. He argued that division of labour increases as societies evolve from simple to complex forms, similar to how organs specialize within the human body.
Émile Durkheim’s Theory of Division of Labour
Émile Durkheim gave many major sociological concepts like social facts, division of labour, theory of suicide, and theory of sacred and profane along with his major contribution towards Functional Perspective of Sociology. Émile Durkheim (1893), in his seminal work The Division of Labour in Society, gave a sociological explanation of division of labour. His primary concern was not economic productivity but social cohesion.
Durkheim argued that division of labour transforms:
- Social structure
- Human relationships
- Moral regulation
- Type of solidarity
Mechanical and Organic Solidarity
Durkheim identified two forms of social solidarity that correspond to two stages of social evolution.
1️⃣ Mechanical Solidarity
- Found in traditional, small, simple societies
- People share common beliefs, values, and work
- Collective conscience is strong
- Law is repressive — punishment for deviation is severe
Example: Tribal society where people hunt, gather, and share similar lifestyles.
Here, social cohesion comes from likeness — people are bonded because they are similar.
2️⃣ Organic Solidarity
- Found in modern, industrial, large-scale societies
- Individuals have different and specialized roles
- People depend on each other for survival (interdependence)
- Collective conscience becomes weak but more tolerant
- Law is restitutive — promotes cooperation and restoration
Example: Doctors, engineers, teachers, farmers — each depends on others.
Here, cohesion arises from difference — unity through specialization.
Division of Labour and Social Solidarity
Durkheim linked social change with the progressive development of division of labour:
| Type of Society | Solidarity | Nature of Law | Source of Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Traditional | Mechanical | Repressive | Similarity |
| Modern | Organic | Restitutive | Interdependence |
Durkheim believed that increasing division of labour is necessary for the survival of modern industrial societies.
Pathological Forms of Division of Labour
Durkheim also warned that division of labour can become dysfunctional under certain conditions. These are called pathological forms:
1️⃣ Anomic Division of Labour
- Occurs when rapid social change disrupts norms
- Moral regulation weakens
- Leads to anomie (normlessness)
- Creates conflict between worker and system
2️⃣ Forced Division of Labour
- When inequality restricts fair distribution of roles
- Power and privilege determine occupation, not merit
- Results in worker dissatisfaction and instability
3️⃣ Poorly Coordinated Division of Labour
- Over-specialization creates isolation
- Lack of cooperation and integration
- Causes breakdown in social solidarity
Thus, division of labour must be accompanied by moral regulation to function effectively.
Importance of Durkheim’s Theory of Division of Labour
Durkheim’s contribution goes beyond economic interpretations. His theory:
- Established social solidarity as core to social organization
- Provided first scientific study linking work and morality
- Championed sociology as distinct from economics and psychology
- Introduced concepts like anomie and restitutive law
- Helped develop structural functionalism
His ideas remain central in studies of industrialization, labour laws, and modern organizations.
Conclusion
Durkheim transformed the concept of division of labour into a deeper sociological insight. He showed how specialization shapes not just the economy but the entire moral fabric of society. While it promotes interdependence in modern societies, lack of proper regulation can lead to pathological outcomes such as anomie and conflict. Understanding Durkheim’s theory helps us analyze ongoing labour transformations in the modern world like the gig economy, automation, and globalization.
Share this Article with your friends :
Discover more from Srishti IAS
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
